A friend of mine recently found me on Facebook and was somewhat surprised to see me label myself as "liberal". Being someone who generally despises being labeled in any way, here's a bit of expansion on that theme:
In terms of civil liberty, I'm technically on the libertarian side, meaning government should have little or no role in saying what consenting adults can do to/with each other. Therefore, my opinions in this area may qualify as "liberal" but may not resemble the liberal status quo. For example, I don't think the government has ANY worthwhile role in conducting or certifying marriages, of ANY type. However, if they are going to be involved in any type, they shouldn't be discriminating, in any way.
In relation to that thought, I think religion, in any form, needs to be kept far away from government policy. Some of us don't even believe in god, so it's pretty alarming when believers start to try to legislate their nonsecular morality on us. I believe secular humanism provides a pretty good framework for how people should treat each other, without getting god involved.
In terms of the environment, I fall soundly on the green side of things. Government has to protect natural resources because it is rarely in any individual's apparent short-term interest to do so. I happen to believe in protecting species, ecosystems, and environments for their own sake, but I don't think one needs to hold such views to support environmental protection. We're living in a closed system with finite resources, and preemptive protective legislation is a whole lot more desirable than massive population crashes (i.e. nature's way).
As for fiscal policy, I think we have been and are spending way to much money on just about everything. You have to balance budgets, sooner than later in my opinion, or you're just handing all of the problems to your children. This doesn't mean I'm a libertarian. It just means I don't want to bankrupt the country, collapse our currency, or create hyper-inflation. If you're going to have a government funded program, it needs to be FUNDED.
In terms of fiscal priority, I feel the welfare of the individual is much more important than that of the corporation. Corporations shouldn't have rights like individuals, and they should play absolutely no financial role in influencing policy decisions. I believe we should spend less money on killing people, and more money on helping them. Yeah, I think my hair is longer than it used to be.
I think that capitalism needs serious checks and balances the same way government does, or you get a series of rather dramatic financial bubbles, which tend to screw over the little guy, ultimately. Thoughtful regulation would work, with the emphasis on thoughtful. Throwing money at problems accompanied by knee-jerk grandstanding on CSPAN isn't doing anyone any good, regardless of the side of the aisle the bullshit is flying from.
I think that in the end, the most valuable role government can play is one that encourages the highest quality secular education for as many people as possible. It's a big world, with way too many of us, and the problems we're going face are enormous and complex. I want individuals who can think trying to navigate around these problems, instead of people who can shout in reaction to them while the ship is already sinking.
P.S. I've gone back and changed my political views to "complicated".
